Private Equity Across Jurisdictions: Structuring for Legal Efficiency

The global private equity (PE) market has evolved into a sophisticated, high-growth investment space that plays a central role in financing businesses, fostering innovation, and driving cross-border economic expansion. While private equity offers significant returns and portfolio diversification, structuring investments across jurisdictions requires meticulous legal planning, especially in today’s environment of increased regulatory scrutiny and tax transparency.

Whether you're raising a fund, structuring a holding company, or deploying capital into international businesses, the success of a private equity strategy depends on aligning legal efficiency with commercial objectives, tax optimization, investor expectations, and regulatory compliance.

This article explores global private equity trends, common legal structures, tax and regulatory considerations, and practical steps for mitigating cross-border risk.

Global Private Equity Trends: Capital Without Borders

Despite economic uncertainty in some regions, private equity continues to thrive, with significant growth across technology, healthcare, infrastructure, and ESG-focused investments. Investors are increasingly looking beyond domestic markets for higher returns, market diversification, and exposure to high-growth emerging economies.

Several key trends define the current global PE landscape:

✔ Increased Focus on Emerging Markets: Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America are attracting more capital, though with higher legal and political risk.

✔ ESG Integration: Investors and fund managers are embedding Environmental, Social, and Governance principles into fund formation and deal structuring.

✔ Regulatory Tightening: Enhanced scrutiny from tax authorities and financial regulators has reshaped how funds and holding structures are designed.

✔ Offshore Reputational Shift: While traditional offshore jurisdictions remain common, investors increasingly favor structures with economic substance and clear tax compliance.

As private equity expands across borders, legal structuring has become more complex — and more critical.

Common Legal Structures for Cross-Border Private Equity

Private equity structures must balance investor protection, tax efficiency, regulatory compliance, and commercial flexibility. The most common vehicles include:

1. Limited Partnerships (LPs):

The gold standard for private equity funds in the U.S., UK, Luxembourg, and Cayman Islands. LPs provide:

• Pass-through tax treatment for investors

• Flexibility in profit distribution

• Limited liability for investors

• Clear fund governance structures

Example: The Luxembourg Special Limited Partnership (SCSp) has become a favored structure for EU-based PE funds due to its flexible, tax-efficient regime under the Securitisation Law 2004 and alignment with AIFMD (Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive) requirements.

2. Holding Companies:

Used to pool investment capital and hold target companies or assets. Common jurisdictions include:

• Netherlands: Attractive due to its extensive tax treaty network and exemption regimes.

• Luxembourg: Widely used for EU investments with favorable tax treatment.

• British Virgin Islands (BVI): Still common for holding structures in emerging markets, though economic substance requirements apply post-OECD BEPS.

3. Fund-of-Funds and Feeder Structures:

Facilitate investor participation through onshore and offshore entities, allowing for tax and regulatory optimization across jurisdictions.

4. Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs):

Created for individual investments, SPVs isolate risk, provide tax efficiency, and simplify deal-specific governance.

5. Offshore Entities:

While offshore jurisdictions remain useful, investors and regulators now demand greater transparency, economic substance, and compliance with tax disclosure obligations.

Tax and Regulatory Considerations: Aligning Efficiency with Compliance

Tax efficiency is a major driver in private equity structuring, but legal compliance and reputation cannot be sacrificed for tax savings.

Key Considerations:

✔ Double Taxation Treaties (DTTs): Proper structuring can minimize withholding taxes and avoid double taxation. For example, Luxembourg and the Netherlands provide favorable treaty access for EU and global investments.

✔ OECD BEPS & Economic Substance: The OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) framework, particularly Action 5, targets artificial structures. Jurisdictions like BVI, Cayman, and Jersey have implemented substance laws requiring real operations, local directors, and physical presence.

✔ FATCA & CRS Compliance: Global transparency initiatives such as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and the Common Reporting Standard (CRS) demand disclosure of ownership structures and financial accounts.

✔ EU AIFMD Compliance: Private equity funds marketed to EU investors must comply with the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, impacting fund governance, reporting, and depositary requirements.

✔ Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Rules: Enhanced AML/KYC regulations apply across fund jurisdictions, with regulators scrutinizing complex ownership chains.

Non-compliance with these rules doesn't just risk penalties — it can delay bank account opening, deter institutional investors, and erode counterparties' trust.

Cross-Border Risk Mitigation: Protecting Capital and Reputation

International private equity investments carry inherent legal and commercial risks. Effective risk management starts with structuring:

✔ Jurisdictional Due Diligence: Evaluate political, legal, and tax stability of target markets. Understand regulatory risks, such as foreign ownership restrictions or currency controls.

✔ Robust Legal Documentation: Clearly drafted shareholder agreements, subscription documents, and fund terms protect investors and outline governance.

✔ Operational Substance: Ensure holding companies and fund vehicles meet substance requirements — not just on paper — to withstand regulatory scrutiny.

✔ Dispute Resolution Planning: Cross-border deals often include arbitration clauses under the New York Convention (1958) to ensure enforceability across jurisdictions.

✔ Tax and Regulatory Reviews: Regularly review fund and holding structures to adapt to evolving global tax rules, particularly as the OECD's Pillar Two Global Minimum Tax takes effect.

Conclusion: Structuring Private Equity with Legal Precision and Business Focus

Private equity across jurisdictions offers significant returns, but without careful legal structuring, even the best deals can face tax inefficiencies, regulatory delays, and reputational damage.

Successful cross-border private equity requires more than technical legal knowledge — it demands commercial insight, investor alignment, and risk-managed, compliant structures.

At Lampião & Sokolovich Attorneys, we advise fund managers, investors, and family offices on legally sound, tax-efficient, and commercially viable private equity structures across leading global jurisdictions.

If you are raising capital, structuring cross-border investments, or managing private equity operations internationally, speak with our legal team to design a structure that protects your capital and meets global legal standards.

Looking for bespoke legal strategy? Let's start a conversation.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.